If you are looking for Information about PSU Clementine, Go check their Wiki
Talk:Fighgunner
Opinions on the design
Sorry; I meant to post my thoughts on this last night, but I kept getting distracted. Anyway, I think it looks great. I see a few things to be corrected, but they're all pretty minor. (Types instead of class and some capitalization here and there.) While looking at this, I had an idea for a chart we could use to display requirements and weapon/PA proficiencies. When I get a chance, I'll see if I can create it. - EspioKaos 15:04, 14 February 2008 (CST)
- I'll defect to your expertise on the details, but I had some ideas for cleaning up the main Types page as well after the individual
classtype pages were finished. In the meantime, still open to design and content suggestions before starting on the rest. -Sekani 17:52, 14 February 2008 (CST)- I personally think that the chart used in this page (as of this comment) is fine, though for completion's sake and ease of copy/pasting, there should be a row for TECHNIC proficiency (even if it IS a bit redundant). But that's just my opinion. Also, should links to the specific weapon types be added to the table? Just thought I'd ask beforehand. - Alkaiser 18:44, 14 February 2008 (CST)
- I don't see we don't use something like this for the proficiency:
- I personally think that the chart used in this page (as of this comment) is fine, though for completion's sake and ease of copy/pasting, there should be a row for TECHNIC proficiency (even if it IS a bit redundant). But that's just my opinion. Also, should links to the specific weapon types be added to the table? Just thought I'd ask beforehand. - Alkaiser 18:44, 14 February 2008 (CST)
| X |  |
A |  |
A |  |
S |  |
| S |  |
S |  |
A |  | ||
| S |  |
S |  |
A |  |
||
| A |  |
||||||
| A |  |
A |  | ||||
| A |  |
A |  |
A |  | ||
Also, it looks like your :* for a bullet point breaks subsequent bullet points, Alkaiser. --Qwerty 19:38, 14 February 2008 (CST)
- I thought about using a table like that, but reconsidered because I didn't think it presented the information in the easiest to read manner. I like using tables for statistics or comparisons, but other than that it seems to be overkill for the sake of aesthetics. Just my opinion.
And the bullet points are still all screwy, what the hell? -Sekani 20:45, 14 February 2008 (CST) - Really? Eh, I'm pretty much new to wiki editing (lol nublet), so I figure I'm bound to make a few mistakes here and there. The more you know, right? I just hope I didn't break this thing... anyway, yeah, I'd think that that table could work for individual weapon proficiencies.- Alkaiser 23:06, 14 February 2008 (CST)
- I thought about using a table like that, but reconsidered because I didn't think it presented the information in the easiest to read manner. I like using tables for statistics or comparisons, but other than that it seems to be overkill for the sake of aesthetics. Just my opinion.
- Heh, that's one of the things I was planning on adding, though I'd also like to include requirements and other data in the table. Looking at it now, I forgot that the proficiencies would take up so many rows when emulated like the game's table. I don't think I'd have enough info to fill in so much space. So, back to the drawing table! - EspioKaos 23:20, 14 February 2008 (CST)
Points for leveling
I think there should be a Mission Point chart for this class, so we know how much MP it will take to level it up.
- There is one chart, but instead of it being on each type page, it's in the Types page, how much MP is needed for Basic, Advanced and Master types. http://psupedia.info/Types#Type_levels_and_changing_Types - Ezodagrom 09:48, 17 January 2009 (CST)
