If you are looking for Information about PSU Clementine, Go check their Wiki

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mewn"

From The re-PSUPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Proposed New Logo)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
:No insult taken; you should hear some of my other clients' comments.  ^_^;;;  Actually, I was trying to keep within the general feel of the game itself (hexagons, icons vice photorealism, etc.)  Maybe removing the photon emblem in the center would help?--[[User:Shinzakura|Shinzakura]] 21:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 
:No insult taken; you should hear some of my other clients' comments.  ^_^;;;  Actually, I was trying to keep within the general feel of the game itself (hexagons, icons vice photorealism, etc.)  Maybe removing the photon emblem in the center would help?--[[User:Shinzakura|Shinzakura]] 21:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 
:Another problem I noticed is the logo size itself.  the current one is 135x135px.  The test logo is 150x150px.  Is there a software or sizing limitation that I need to know about (it might make it harder to make the planets larger, or do anything else with the font as necessary.--[[User:Shinzakura|Shinzakura]] 22:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 
:Another problem I noticed is the logo size itself.  the current one is 135x135px.  The test logo is 150x150px.  Is there a software or sizing limitation that I need to know about (it might make it harder to make the planets larger, or do anything else with the font as necessary.--[[User:Shinzakura|Shinzakura]] 22:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
* Will definitely make for an improvement. >_>
 +
*: I'm trying to come up with concrete ideas to tweak it a bit, but maybe I'm not really sure what I'd like either. In any case, in addition to Mewn's remarks, I was wondering about the icons -- why these? I'm thinking it might be good if it was easier to recognize as being PSU-related (yeah, I know the clover is even less so XP). Anyway, looking forward to see what you'd decide on eventually. I definitely wouldn't be able to make something decent. >_< - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 22:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
*: N.B.: Not sure if it'd resize automatically; could try it out, but I'm guessing it wouldn't, in which case it'd be more convenient to keep with the current width.

Revision as of 22:21, 11 March 2007

I have it here at User:Shinzakura/Sandbox. Please let me know if this works and I can tweak or prepare a finalized version as necessary. Thanks.--Shinzakura 21:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

  • It looks nice (I like the planets/GC idea), but it looks a bit too... 80s, I suppose. I dunno, it's probably just me, but it looks really retro >_<

Don't take that as an insult, it's good work and a massive improvement over the current logo, I just wonder if you could experiment with removing the hexagon and making the planets/GC bigger and more clear. Mewn 21:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

No insult taken; you should hear some of my other clients' comments. ^_^;;; Actually, I was trying to keep within the general feel of the game itself (hexagons, icons vice photorealism, etc.) Maybe removing the photon emblem in the center would help?--Shinzakura 21:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Another problem I noticed is the logo size itself. the current one is 135x135px. The test logo is 150x150px. Is there a software or sizing limitation that I need to know about (it might make it harder to make the planets larger, or do anything else with the font as necessary.--Shinzakura 22:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Will definitely make for an improvement. >_>
    I'm trying to come up with concrete ideas to tweak it a bit, but maybe I'm not really sure what I'd like either. In any case, in addition to Mewn's remarks, I was wondering about the icons -- why these? I'm thinking it might be good if it was easier to recognize as being PSU-related (yeah, I know the clover is even less so XP). Anyway, looking forward to see what you'd decide on eventually. I definitely wouldn't be able to make something decent. >_< - Tycho 22:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
    N.B.: Not sure if it'd resize automatically; could try it out, but I'm guessing it wouldn't, in which case it'd be more convenient to keep with the current width.