If you are looking for Information about PSU Clementine, Go check their Wiki
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elements"
From The re-PSUPedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT) | * Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | * It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 1 September 2006
- Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - Tycho 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
- It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay Mewn 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
