If you are looking for Information about PSU Clementine, Go check their Wiki
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fighgunner"
From The re-PSUPedia
(→Opinions on the design) |
(→Opinions on the design) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sorry; I meant to post my thoughts on this last night, but I kept getting distracted. Anyway, I think it looks great. I see a few things to be corrected, but they're all pretty minor. (''Types'' instead of ''class'' and some capitalization here and there.) While looking at this, I had an idea for a chart we could use to display requirements and weapon/PA proficiencies. When I get a chance, I'll see if I can create it. - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 15:04, 14 February 2008 (CST) | Sorry; I meant to post my thoughts on this last night, but I kept getting distracted. Anyway, I think it looks great. I see a few things to be corrected, but they're all pretty minor. (''Types'' instead of ''class'' and some capitalization here and there.) While looking at this, I had an idea for a chart we could use to display requirements and weapon/PA proficiencies. When I get a chance, I'll see if I can create it. - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 15:04, 14 February 2008 (CST) | ||
* I'll defect to your expertise on the details, but I had some ideas for cleaning up the main [[Types]] page as well after the individual <strike>class</strike> type pages were finished. In the meantime, still open to design and content suggestions before starting on the rest. -[[User:Sekani|Sekani]] 17:52, 14 February 2008 (CST) | * I'll defect to your expertise on the details, but I had some ideas for cleaning up the main [[Types]] page as well after the individual <strike>class</strike> type pages were finished. In the meantime, still open to design and content suggestions before starting on the rest. -[[User:Sekani|Sekani]] 17:52, 14 February 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | :* I personally think that the chart used in this page (as of this comment) is fine, though for completion's sake and ease of copy/pasting, there should be a row for TECHNIC proficiency (even if it IS a bit redundant). But that's just my opinion. Also, should links to the specific weapon types be added to the table? Just thought I'd ask beforehand. - [[User:Alkaiser|Alkaiser]] 18:44, 14 February 2008 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 00:44, 15 February 2008
Opinions on the design
Sorry; I meant to post my thoughts on this last night, but I kept getting distracted. Anyway, I think it looks great. I see a few things to be corrected, but they're all pretty minor. (Types instead of class and some capitalization here and there.) While looking at this, I had an idea for a chart we could use to display requirements and weapon/PA proficiencies. When I get a chance, I'll see if I can create it. - EspioKaos 15:04, 14 February 2008 (CST)
- I'll defect to your expertise on the details, but I had some ideas for cleaning up the main Types page as well after the individual
classtype pages were finished. In the meantime, still open to design and content suggestions before starting on the rest. -Sekani 17:52, 14 February 2008 (CST)
- I personally think that the chart used in this page (as of this comment) is fine, though for completion's sake and ease of copy/pasting, there should be a row for TECHNIC proficiency (even if it IS a bit redundant). But that's just my opinion. Also, should links to the specific weapon types be added to the table? Just thought I'd ask beforehand. - Alkaiser 18:44, 14 February 2008 (CST)
