Talk:S-Rank Listing

New, but unconfirmed/incomplete drop info

• JP PSU has now got HIVE and Linear Line missions with level 100+ monsters, I'm trying to get some solid info but I haven't really got much in the way of confirmations yet. But I know the following now drop: [B] Hyper Viper, [B] Viper, [B] Crimson, [B] Gizaha-zashi, [B] Blackheart, [B] Agito Repca, [B] Gaozoran Rod. I'll add them into the main article when I can get hold of some solid info on what they drop from, though I have hunches. Mewn 00:17, 22 June 2007 (BST)

Colour-coding

• It strikes me that the current table might be better to look at if it was colour-coded to show what is available and what isn't (rather than looking at the actual text). I'd suggest red for items unavailable even on JP, blue for items available on JP but not US, and the standard grey for items available on US. Thoughts? - Mewn 17:01, 20 July 2007 (BST)
  • Sounds like a fine idea to me. --Qwerty 17:47, 22 July 2007 (BST)
  • Didn't want to edit the actual page, since what I did looks dumb as is: http://psupedia.info/The_PSUPedia:Sandbox:S-ranks I fail with Wikis, so I can't figure out how to make it look better Saiffy 23:34, 22 July 2007 (BST)
    • I don't see any colors on that page. In other news, I just made my own attempt at the color thing here. Comments? --Qwerty 00:18, 23 July 2007 (BST)
      • The table seems a bit messed up. Maybe just my browser idk. Anyways, it looks nice than my attempt, I just don't really like the colours used :S Saiffy 00:44, 23 July 2007 (BST)
      • If by 'messed up' you mean 'missing several borders' then it's almost certainly a Firefox bug which can mess up table renders. I find clicking the article/userpage tab sometimes restores it to how it should be, but there's no real way to stop it other than to use a different browser, since it affects different users randomly.
    • As for the colours, I'd prefer the colours I suggested or something similar. I don't like dark grey when, to me, red would stand out so much better compared to the lighter grey. I'd prefer to see a darker colour than cyan too, or certainly something a bit softer. Mewn 01:20, 23 July 2007 (BST)
    • Wat http://psupedia.info/User:Beatrixkiddo/Sandbox --Beatrixkiddo 01:48, 23 July 2007 (BST)
      • Looks great! What about changing the manufacturer names into their respective icons to match the other pages? EspioKaos 04:42, 23 July 2007 (BST)
        • Done. The colors are fine though? --Beatrixkiddo 04:59, 23 July 2007 (BST)
          • I like em n.n Saiffy 05:04, 23 July 2007 (BST)
        • DO NOT WANT. But yeah, I really, really do not like the icons instead of the text for the manufacturers. Not only do I not like how it looks, it is now making the table break on me every single time I load the page. So yeah, the colros are great, but leave the manufacturers as text. :\ --Qwerty 05:10, 23 July 2007 (BST)
        • The colours are great. As for the icons, I don't mind either way, but if it's contributing to the table breaking problem, it might be better to revert them to text. - Mewn 12:30, 23 July 2007 (BST)
        • How odd. When I looked at the updated list at home this morning, the table borders were jacked up at certain points. I'm at work now, and they look fine. Strangely enough, I'm using the same browser (Firefox ver.2.0.0.5) on both computers. It's a frustrating glitch. If others are still experiencing it, though, the text links would be better. EspioKaos 17:46, 23 July 2007 (BST)
        • Yeah, this has been raised a few times, it's a Firefox bug but it seems to be pretty random. I suspect the most we can do is alleviate it as until whatever causes this problem is fixed, it'll carry on happening. In the meantime, temporary fixes include clicking the article/userpage tab at the top of the screen (doesn't always work), trying to refresh the page (ditto), or downloading the IETab extension, as you can use it to switch a tab to IE (which doesn't seem to have this problem). Mewn 17:59, 23 July 2007 (BST)
          • Wow, now that is really odd. Last night, it load only load correctly like once out of 25-30 page-loads. Today, it's only breaking about 1 out of 10. This doesn't make any sense. D: --Qwerty 18:55, 23 July 2007 (BST)