Difference between revisions of "User talk:Amaury"

Revision as of 02:08, 27 January 2008

A little note

I won't apologize for the temporary suspension of your account; consider it a lesson, as we're getting tired of cleaning up after you. Mistakes are fine; we're all human, so we all make them from time to time. But I take the alteration of another user's personal page as going too far, and by now you should know better. Sarin has the right to delete her own page if she wants to; you do not have the right to revert it. Your account will automatically reactivate in 24 hours. - EspioKaos 10:46, 21 January 2008 (CST)

Assumptions

• Defense is blue, invincinble is purple. I've seen it myself. Amaury 11:56, 3 January 2008 (CST)
• 35 sec Blue Nanoblast: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44fRpyohFU8 --Zoamel Gustav 03:20, 5 January 2008 (CST)

• Then I better change the name of Alfort Tylor's badge. Thank you so much! Now I know. =) Amaury 02:27, 6 January 2008 (CST)
• "Now I know."? Before editing, check the source of the information. Do not make edits without proof first. Edits must be based on facts. Do not make edits based on assumptions. Don't claim to have seen something which is not true. Check the facts. --Zoamel Gustav 05:08, 6 January 2008 (CST)

• Boggo Val is the invinsible Nanoblast. I checked on a guy's status that was in my party yesterday and he was blue, and he had Boggo Val. Amaury 12:36, 6 January 2008 (CST)

• Do not ignore what I just said. That is not proof. Here is proof:

• All right. Thanks. Sorry about that. Amaury 10:12, 7 January 2008 (CST)

Manual of style

Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with our manual of style. We spent quite a lot of time setting it up to help keep a uniform appearance to the articles created on the site, and would appreciate it if all contributors followed the guidelines set forth by it. You may have noticed me rolling back articles you've recently edited. The reason for this is because your edits (in particular, capitalization of words that don't require it) go against the style established for the site. Thanks! - EspioKaos 21:30, 2 January 2008 (CST)

• Ok. Got it! But shouldn't the races be capitalized? Because it's the name of something. Amaury 21:31, 2 January 2008 (CST)
  • Just as human isn't a proper noun in English, newman and beast follow the same rule. CAST is the only exception, and that's merely because SonicTeam decided that it should be in all caps like TECHNICs and a few other names. - EspioKaos 21:34, 2 January 2008 (CST)
• Same with the names of weapons. Amaury 21:32, 2 January 2008 (CST)
  • Individual weapon names are capitialized (Card Fante, Falgohoh, Raygun, etc.) but not generic weapon category names (saber, whip, slicer, etc.). - EspioKaos 21:35, 2 January 2008 (CST)
• Then shouldn't the Daggers page be like the Sabers page? Also, some of the other weapons catergories have "Knows Weapon Name (Network Mode) Amaury 21:36, 2 January 2008 (CST)
  • Ultimately, the phrase network mode will be removed from articles like that as it is simply assumed since most everyone who visits the site comes here for information on items in network mode. Articles that deal with things from offline mode will have offline included in them somewhere. There still are a number of small things that need cleaning all around the site, such as those sections. The hard part is getting to them all. - EspioKaos 21:45, 2 January 2008 (CST)

Re: Character articles

Weapon				Name	Linked	Effect	Used During
?★				?	?	Level ? to ? Skill	Levels ?
?★				?	?	Level ? to ? Bullet	Levels ?
?★				?
					?	Level ? to ? TECHNIC	Levels ?
					?	Level ? to ? TECHNIC	Levels ?
					?	Level ? to ? TECHNIC	Levels ?
					?	Level ? to ? TECHNIC	Levels ?
?★				?
					?	Level ? to ? TECHNIC	Levels ?
					?	Level ? to ? TECHNIC	Levels ?

Equipment				Name	Slot	Effect	Used During
?★				?	Line shield	-	Levels ?
-	-			? Val	Blast Badge	? Nanoblast	Levels 20+
?★	-			?	Extra unit	? SUV	Levels 20+

No need to reply. Use as needed. --Zoamel Gustav 04:12, 21 January 2008 (CST)

A "Comment" implies an explanation or opinion. An "Effect" is a factual result. The result of linking a item to a slot is an effect, not a comment. Comments can be be it's own subsection. A "Quote" is quotation. "Chat shortcut" is an in-game term. Chat is more specific. "It came from outer orbit. You can't have one." is a quote. "Condition: Burned" is chat. --Zoamel Gustav 19:43, 26 January 2008 (CST)

• Ah, I get it now. Thank you. Amaury 20:08, 26 January 2008 (CST)

User Reviews

Thanks for contributing your knowledge to PSUpedia. One small thing though, please use the Preview button when you can, to cut down on the number of edits total. Thanks! --Beatrixkiddo 17:18, 21 December 2007 (CST)

• Seconding this. Octuple updating really isn't necessary. - Miraglyth 21:04, 21 December 2007 (CST)
  • Thirding. --JubeiSaotome 03:24, 22 December 2007 (CST)
• Fourthing. I'm sorry, but if you continue to make repetitive edits (tonight, you edited your user page 11 times in 50 minutes), I'll have no other option but to block you for a short period. Please, use the preview button, and make all of your edits at once, so I won't have to do that. --Qwerty 17:38, 23 December 2007 (CST)
  • Ok, this is really getting annoying. This isn't a forum, so quit making largely pointless edits on people's talk pages. Don't tell us what you edited; we already know. Don't post stuff like "Oh, sorry." That's just spam. Don't make so many repeated edits, I've already warned you about that. Don't do stupid things like changing the date in the luck box. I think we all damn well know what year it is. I'm trying to be as fair and lenient with you as I can, but if you're going to contribute, please do it in a more non-spam fashion. --Qwerty 20:48, 29 December 2007 (CST)
• Reverted back to old user talk, let them serve as a warning. You do some decent edits, you just need to not edit based on assumptions and use the preview function. Also, quit filling my user talk up with pointless updates on what you changed. --JubeiSaotome 21:38, 29 December 2007 (CST)
• There's no reason for you to remove this, so I have to ask: why you are doing it? If you can give me a satisfactory answer I will allow you to remove these comments. If you remove this again without explaining why you will be given a final warning, something I'd rather not do as it's hardly in our interests to get caught up in this. These comments are merely here to guide you and tell you what we don't need doing around here. Please don't brush them aside - especially not the comments from Miraglyth and Qwerty, who, like me, are staffers. - Mewn 06:39, 31 December 2007 (CST)
• Considering you fixed the Humanoids article before I got to it, I'll let it slide this time. But seriously, please double check before making any edits at all. You are creating extra work for people by making mistakes, and it has become quite annoying. Is this clear? --Qwerty 21:11, 20 January 2008 (CST)