User talk:Tycho/Sandbox - Revision history

Mmsp15: /* Front Page */ (whoops forgot to sign :P)

2009-05-21T00:27:35Z

‎Front Page: (whoops forgot to sign :P)

Mmsp15: /* Front Page */

2009-05-21T00:27:06Z

‎Front Page

S-T-H: /* Front Page */

2009-05-20T03:06:58Z

‎Front Page

Qwerty at 01:55, 20 May 2009

2009-05-20T01:55:58Z

EspioKaos at 15:27, 5 October 2008

2008-10-05T15:27:09Z

Tycho at 21:06, 18 February 2007

2007-02-18T21:06:27Z

Miraglyth at 04:29, 18 February 2007

2007-02-18T04:29:20Z

Miraglyth: Comments.

2007-02-18T04:22:46Z

Comments.

New page

==Automation Possibility?==
* So given monsters' base stats, they all share a common set of level multipliers? If so, tables like this would be pretty sweet. In addition though, would it not be possible to make lookup tables of said multipliers and said monster base stats to create automated bestiaries for each mission page given the mobs in the mission and the level of each difficulty?<br>(I know that's thinking on a somewhat grand scale, but if it is possible then that'd be one heck of an efficient way to add a lot of detail to every mission article.) - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)

==Table Comments==
* That's an impressive set of information, but it does make the table too wide for the page unless users are running 1920x1440 or something. I guess that can't really be complained about since function is more important than visual, however I do question the use of the "Attr." column since (unless the data is false and real values differ) all entries seem to be 100 even for non-elemental foes. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * I think it looks a bit silly like that, to be honest. Most of the really important links are in the sidebar without scrolling anyway. Just my two cents. --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 20:55, 19 May 2009 (CDT)
 * I think with all the changes and organization that have been done since both the sidebar and that navigational section got settled in, we could probably look into something new.  --[[User:S-T-H|S-T-H]] 22:06, 19 May 2009 (CDT)
-* I think that the green box saying psupedia could prob be removed since the logo says it all... if ppl dont know where they are by seeing that already then something is wrong :p, also maybe reducing the recent updates to just 3 things instead of 4 since 4 updates back is usually a month+ more back... most of us visitors and contributors usually watch the recent changes like a hawk (least i know i do lol)
+* I think that the green box saying psupedia could prob be removed since the logo says it all... if ppl dont know where they are by seeing that already then something is wrong :p, also maybe reducing the recent updates to just 3 things instead of 4 since 4 updates back is usually a month+ more back... most of us visitors and contributors usually watch the recent changes like a hawk (least i know i do lol)--[[User:Mmsp15|MMSP15 Created1]] 19:27, 20 May 2009 (CDT)
 == Stacked drop charts ==

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * I think it looks a bit silly like that, to be honest. Most of the really important links are in the sidebar without scrolling anyway. Just my two cents. --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 20:55, 19 May 2009 (CDT)
 * I think with all the changes and organization that have been done since both the sidebar and that navigational section got settled in, we could probably look into something new.  --[[User:S-T-H|S-T-H]] 22:06, 19 May 2009 (CDT)
 == Stacked drop charts ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Front Page ==
 * I think it looks a bit silly like that, to be honest. Most of the really important links are in the sidebar without scrolling anyway. Just my two cents. --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 20:55, 19 May 2009 (CDT)
 == Stacked drop charts ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 20 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Front Page ==
		+	* I think it looks a bit silly like that, to be honest. Most of the really important links are in the sidebar without scrolling anyway. Just my two cents. --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 20:55, 19 May 2009 (CDT)
		+
	== Stacked drop charts ==		== Stacked drop charts ==
	* Very nice. The stacked charts look a lot better for the single-difficulty ''PSP'' missions. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 10:27, 5 October 2008 (CDT)		* Very nice. The stacked charts look a lot better for the single-difficulty ''PSP'' missions. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 10:27, 5 October 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 5 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Stacked drop charts ==
		+	* Very nice. The stacked charts look a lot better for the single-difficulty ''PSP'' missions. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 10:27, 5 October 2008 (CDT)
		+
	==Automation Possibility?==		==Automation Possibility?==
	* So given monsters' base stats, they all share a common set of level multipliers? If so, tables like this would be pretty sweet. In addition though, would it not be possible to make lookup tables of said multipliers and said monster base stats to create automated bestiaries for each mission page given the mobs in the mission and the level of each difficulty?<br>(I know that's thinking on a somewhat grand scale, but if it is possible then that'd be one heck of an efficient way to add a lot of detail to every mission article.) - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)		* So given monsters' base stats, they all share a common set of level multipliers? If so, tables like this would be pretty sweet. In addition though, would it not be possible to make lookup tables of said multipliers and said monster base stats to create automated bestiaries for each mission page given the mobs in the mission and the level of each difficulty?<br>(I know that's thinking on a somewhat grand scale, but if it is possible then that'd be one heck of an efficient way to add a lot of detail to every mission article.) - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Automation Possibility?==
 * So given monsters' base stats, they all share a common set of level multipliers? If so, tables like this would be pretty sweet. In addition though, would it not be possible to make lookup tables of said multipliers and said monster base stats to create automated bestiaries for each mission page given the mobs in the mission and the level of each difficulty?<br>(I know that's thinking on a somewhat grand scale, but if it is possible then that'd be one heck of an efficient way to add a lot of detail to every mission article.) - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 ==Table Comments==
 * That's an impressive set of information, but it does make the table too wide for the page unless users are running 1920x1440 or something. I guess that can't really be complained about since function is more important than visual, however I do question the use of the "Attr." column since (unless the data is false and real values differ) all entries seem to be 100 even for non-elemental foes. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 ** Oh yeah. I'd forgot to mention - The system of "Small", "Medium" and "Big" doesn't do much for me. It makes no differentiation between Zoona and Volfu (both "Medium"), or between Polavohra and Magas Maggahna (both "Big"). - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 22:29, 17 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 18 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==Table Comments==		==Table Comments==
	* That's an impressive set of information, but it does make the table too wide for the page unless users are running 1920x1440 or something. I guess that can't really be complained about since function is more important than visual, however I do question the use of the "Attr." column since (unless the data is false and real values differ) all entries seem to be 100 even for non-elemental foes. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)		* That's an impressive set of information, but it does make the table too wide for the page unless users are running 1920x1440 or something. I guess that can't really be complained about since function is more important than visual, however I do question the use of the "Attr." column since (unless the data is false and real values differ) all entries seem to be 100 even for non-elemental foes. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 22:22, 17 February 2007 (CST)
		+	** Oh yeah. I'd forgot to mention - The system of "Small", "Medium" and "Big" doesn't do much for me. It makes no differentiation between Zoona and Volfu (both "Medium"), or between Polavohra and Magas Maggahna (both "Big"). - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 22:29, 17 February 2007 (CST)