User talk:Au/Sandbox - Revision history

Au+ at 17:24, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T17:24:32Z

EspioKaos at 21:48, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T21:48:42Z

Au+ at 21:26, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T21:26:52Z

Qwerty at 21:11, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T21:11:31Z

Au+ at 20:46, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T20:46:33Z

Qwerty at 20:07, 19 September 2007

2007-09-19T20:07:57Z

Au+: New page: First steps towards a mission template. Mostly the data from this mission gathered from various other pages; spawn patterns, monster counts and drop tables in one handy page. Comments?

2007-09-19T19:15:07Z

New page: First steps towards a mission template. Mostly the data from this mission gathered from various other pages; spawn patterns, monster counts and drop tables in one handy page. Comments?

New page

First steps towards a mission template. Mostly the data from this mission gathered from various other pages; spawn patterns, monster counts and drop tables in one handy page. Comments?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 21 September 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	**** Changed it to 'Location'.		**** Changed it to 'Location'.
	* Awesome! I was actually planning on getting around to working on this soon(ish), too. In preparation, I began making location image files. (I've got Old Rozenom, Pavilion of Air, Granigs Mine, Paracabana and Oktoku City; all from the expansion.) I may just go ahead an upload those for the sake of having them when the expansion hits. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 22:48, 19 September 2007 (BST)		* Awesome! I was actually planning on getting around to working on this soon(ish), too. In preparation, I began making location image files. (I've got Old Rozenom, Pavilion of Air, Granigs Mine, Paracabana and Oktoku City; all from the expansion.) I may just go ahead an upload those for the sake of having them when the expansion hits. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 22:48, 19 September 2007 (BST)
		+
		+
		+	==Info from other pages==
		+	Alright, if we go ahead with this and copy the rare monster, and mission reward info to here we need to decide what to do with the pages the info comes from. The options as I see it:
		+	<br>1) Remove the previous info (move the info to the individual mission pages)
		+	<br>2) Turn the tables into templates that are included in both pages
		+	<br>3) Change old one to a short summary with link to individual mission pages.
		+	<br>
		+	<br>I think the mission reward tables can be moved from the [[Missions]] page to here; but I'd like to have a list of all missions that shows what level enemy shows up where.
		+	Like this:
		+
		+	{\| class="wikitable"
		+	!Mission!!Rare enemy!!C!!B!!A!!S!!S2
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Unsafe Passage]]\|\|[[Rappy]]\|\|1\|\|20\|\|30\|\|55\|\|80
		+	\|-
		+	\|[[Valley of Carnage]]\|\|[[Jaggo]]\|\|15\|\|35\|\|45\|\|50\|\|85
		+	\|-
		+	\|Etc...\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\|
		+	\|}
		+
		+	Thoughts?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 19 September 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*** Well, you can still include the "Abandoned temple" bit, but we should call it something other than "area" to reduce ambiguity. Anyway, I made that area drops page, and I just cam up with those names off the top of my head. Sure, we could use them, but I think it might be best to open that matter up for discussion first, so we can decide on a standard. I could foresee "COG Temple" being a problem, if in the future there happened to be some temple mission that was clearly not associated with the COG. Just things like that are my concern. --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 22:11, 19 September 2007 (BST)		*** Well, you can still include the "Abandoned temple" bit, but we should call it something other than "area" to reduce ambiguity. Anyway, I made that area drops page, and I just cam up with those names off the top of my head. Sure, we could use them, but I think it might be best to open that matter up for discussion first, so we can decide on a standard. I could foresee "COG Temple" being a problem, if in the future there happened to be some temple mission that was clearly not associated with the COG. Just things like that are my concern. --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 22:11, 19 September 2007 (BST)
	**** Changed it to 'Location'.		**** Changed it to 'Location'.
		+	* Awesome! I was actually planning on getting around to working on this soon(ish), too. In preparation, I began making location image files. (I've got Old Rozenom, Pavilion of Air, Granigs Mine, Paracabana and Oktoku City; all from the expansion.) I may just go ahead an upload those for the sake of having them when the expansion hits. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 22:48, 19 September 2007 (BST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 19 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** I put "Abandoned Temple" there because that's what the game called it in the mission description. I notice the area drops page calls it "COG Temple". Should we follow the standard set by the [[Area Drops]] page? [[User:Au+\|Au+]] 21:46, 19 September 2007 (BST)		** I put "Abandoned Temple" there because that's what the game called it in the mission description. I notice the area drops page calls it "COG Temple". Should we follow the standard set by the [[Area Drops]] page? [[User:Au+\|Au+]] 21:46, 19 September 2007 (BST)
	*** Well, you can still include the "Abandoned temple" bit, but we should call it something other than "area" to reduce ambiguity. Anyway, I made that area drops page, and I just cam up with those names off the top of my head. Sure, we could use them, but I think it might be best to open that matter up for discussion first, so we can decide on a standard. I could foresee "COG Temple" being a problem, if in the future there happened to be some temple mission that was clearly not associated with the COG. Just things like that are my concern. --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 22:11, 19 September 2007 (BST)		*** Well, you can still include the "Abandoned temple" bit, but we should call it something other than "area" to reduce ambiguity. Anyway, I made that area drops page, and I just cam up with those names off the top of my head. Sure, we could use them, but I think it might be best to open that matter up for discussion first, so we can decide on a standard. I could foresee "COG Temple" being a problem, if in the future there happened to be some temple mission that was clearly not associated with the COG. Just things like that are my concern. --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 22:11, 19 September 2007 (BST)
		+	**** Changed it to 'Location'.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 19 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* Looks excellent so far. I was planning on getting around to making mission-based drop charts like you've got here, but I haven't had the time. Anyway, only one thing I would suggest at this point. In the info-box on the right, we should probably be more specific with the "area" field, since that really determines the various area drops. In this case, simply "Temple" instead of "Abandoned temple." --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 21:07, 19 September 2007 (BST)		* Looks excellent so far. I was planning on getting around to making mission-based drop charts like you've got here, but I haven't had the time. Anyway, only one thing I would suggest at this point. In the info-box on the right, we should probably be more specific with the "area" field, since that really determines the various area drops. In this case, simply "Temple" instead of "Abandoned temple." --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 21:07, 19 September 2007 (BST)
	** I put "Abandoned Temple" there because that's what the game called it in the mission description. I notice the area drops page calls it "COG Temple". Should we follow the standard set by the [[Area Drops]] page? [[User:Au+\|Au+]] 21:46, 19 September 2007 (BST)		** I put "Abandoned Temple" there because that's what the game called it in the mission description. I notice the area drops page calls it "COG Temple". Should we follow the standard set by the [[Area Drops]] page? [[User:Au+\|Au+]] 21:46, 19 September 2007 (BST)
		+	*** Well, you can still include the "Abandoned temple" bit, but we should call it something other than "area" to reduce ambiguity. Anyway, I made that area drops page, and I just cam up with those names off the top of my head. Sure, we could use them, but I think it might be best to open that matter up for discussion first, so we can decide on a standard. I could foresee "COG Temple" being a problem, if in the future there happened to be some temple mission that was clearly not associated with the COG. Just things like that are my concern. --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 22:11, 19 September 2007 (BST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 19 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Looks excellent so far. I was planning on getting around to making mission-based drop charts like you've got here, but I haven't had the time. Anyway, only one thing I would suggest at this point. In the info-box on the right, we should probably be more specific with the "area" field, since that really determines the various area drops. In this case, simply "Temple" instead of "Abandoned temple." --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 21:07, 19 September 2007 (BST)		* Looks excellent so far. I was planning on getting around to making mission-based drop charts like you've got here, but I haven't had the time. Anyway, only one thing I would suggest at this point. In the info-box on the right, we should probably be more specific with the "area" field, since that really determines the various area drops. In this case, simply "Temple" instead of "Abandoned temple." --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 21:07, 19 September 2007 (BST)
		+	** I put "Abandoned Temple" there because that's what the game called it in the mission description. I notice the area drops page calls it "COG Temple". Should we follow the standard set by the [[Area Drops]] page? [[User:Au+\|Au+]] 21:46, 19 September 2007 (BST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 19 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	First steps towards a mission template. Mostly the data from this mission gathered from various other pages; spawn patterns, monster counts and drop tables in one handy page. Comments?		First steps towards a mission template. Mostly the data from this mission gathered from various other pages; spawn patterns, monster counts and drop tables in one handy page. Comments?
		+
		+	* Looks excellent so far. I was planning on getting around to making mission-based drop charts like you've got here, but I haven't had the time. Anyway, only one thing I would suggest at this point. In the info-box on the right, we should probably be more specific with the "area" field, since that really determines the various area drops. In this case, simply "Temple" instead of "Abandoned temple." --[[User:Qwerty\|Qwerty]] 21:07, 19 September 2007 (BST)