Template talk:Character Profile - Revision history

Miraglyth at 16:15, 26 November 2006

2006-11-26T16:15:14Z

Miraglyth at 14:29, 26 November 2006

2006-11-26T14:29:40Z

Tycho at 12:15, 26 November 2006

2006-11-26T12:15:44Z

Miraglyth: Oh when will I stop making an arse of myself? Stupid wiki markup >.<

2006-11-26T00:28:56Z

Oh when will I stop making an arse of myself? Stupid wiki markup >.<

Miraglyth at 00:26, 26 November 2006

2006-11-26T00:26:49Z

Miraglyth: /* Thoughts? */

2006-11-25T23:28:19Z

‎Thoughts?

Tycho at 21:37, 25 November 2006

2006-11-25T21:37:16Z

Miraglyth: A good idea?

2006-11-25T18:54:42Z

A good idea?

New page

==Thoughts?==
*Actually this is only a suggestion for the time being. PSUPedia is a wiki about the game, not it's players. Thus making a template for something like this isn't necessarily "on topic" as far as the wiki goes.
:That said, I have noticed a few people who had cloned the profile in my User page, something which if becomes semi-common practise, would benefit from standardisation such as this. Basically looking for input on whether this is a good idea or not. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 10:54, 25 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 26 November 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:I did try using 20px/25px width columns before putting this template together. It still just looks really elongated and ugleh. I did try messing about with making it a new row (which would mean a 9-row table for 4 characters >.<) but you can see how badly that went on my User: page.		:I did try using 20px/25px width columns before putting this template together. It still just looks really elongated and ugleh. I did try messing about with making it a new row (which would mean a 9-row table for 4 characters >.<) but you can see how badly that went on my User: page.
	:At the moment I'm thinking of minor redesigns so it doesn't shrink for users with 1024x768 resolutions. Because really that just shouldn't happen. In the meantime, let me fix a couple of glitches on the <noinclude> section of this and use your <nowiki>{{bar}}</nowiki> method to restore my setup which will in turn fix the erroneous empty rows that currently exist. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 06:29, 26 November 2006 (PST)		:At the moment I'm thinking of minor redesigns so it doesn't shrink for users with 1024x768 resolutions. Because really that just shouldn't happen. In the meantime, let me fix a couple of glitches on the <noinclude> section of this and use your <nowiki>{{bar}}</nowiki> method to restore my setup which will in turn fix the erroneous empty rows that currently exist. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 06:29, 26 November 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	*Done. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 08:15, 26 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 26 November 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:If it becomes necessary >.< then I would go with an additional template. That said, I believe the table's formatting for expert types will be a far more important within a week. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 16:26, 25 November 2006 (PST)		:If it becomes necessary >.< then I would go with an additional template. That said, I believe the table's formatting for expert types will be a far more important within a week. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 16:26, 25 November 2006 (PST)
	* Columns still require tweaking, but yeah. I've had to do this stuff before, so I still kinda knew how to get around it. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 04:15, 26 November 2006 (PST)		* Columns still require tweaking, but yeah. I've had to do this stuff before, so I still kinda knew how to get around it. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 04:15, 26 November 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	*Agh, nuu~
		+	:I did try using 20px/25px width columns before putting this template together. It still just looks really elongated and ugleh. I did try messing about with making it a new row (which would mean a 9-row table for 4 characters >.<) but you can see how badly that went on my User: page.
		+	:At the moment I'm thinking of minor redesigns so it doesn't shrink for users with 1024x768 resolutions. Because really that just shouldn't happen. In the meantime, let me fix a couple of glitches on the <noinclude> section of this and use your <nowiki>{{bar}}</nowiki> method to restore my setup which will in turn fix the erroneous empty rows that currently exist. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 06:29, 26 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 26 November 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Yeah. Trying to work this one out, I've made a complete embarrasment of myself as seen in "Recent Changes". If you use {{}} to group the "then" argument necessary, the <nowiki>{{</nowiki> and <nowiki>}}</nowiki> appear on the table and look stupid. But if you don't use them, the table pretty much breaks.		:Yeah. Trying to work this one out, I've made a complete embarrasment of myself as seen in "Recent Changes". If you use {{}} to group the "then" argument necessary, the <nowiki>{{</nowiki> and <nowiki>}}</nowiki> appear on the table and look stupid. But if you don't use them, the table pretty much breaks.
	:If it becomes necessary >.< then I would go with an additional template. That said, I believe the table's formatting for expert types will be a far more important within a week. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 16:26, 25 November 2006 (PST)		:If it becomes necessary >.< then I would go with an additional template. That said, I believe the table's formatting for expert types will be a far more important within a week. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 16:26, 25 November 2006 (PST)
		+	* Columns still require tweaking, but yeah. I've had to do this stuff before, so I still kinda knew how to get around it. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 04:15, 26 November 2006 (PST)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *Yeah. I did look into adding the ability for multiple characters, but two solutions I saw were using a second template which people repeat for each character a la the "Luck row" template, or using an <nowiki>{{#if:}}</nowiki> function, which for the life of me I couldn't get to work because it requires the same | symbols that tables do >.< - If I could work out how to avoid that conflict, it'd be a breeze to implement. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 15:28, 25 November 2006 (PST)
-:Yeah. Trying to work this one out, I've made a complete embarrasment of myself as seen in "Recent Changes". If you use {{}} to group the "then" argument necessary, the {{ and }} appear on the table and look stupid. But if you don't use them, the table pretty much breaks.
+:Yeah. Trying to work this one out, I've made a complete embarrasment of myself as seen in "Recent Changes". If you use {{}} to group the "then" argument necessary, the <nowiki>{{</nowiki> and <nowiki>}}</nowiki> appear on the table and look stupid. But if you don't use them, the table pretty much breaks.
 :If it becomes necessary >.< then I would go with an additional template. That said, I believe the table's formatting for expert types will be a far more important within a week. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 16:26, 25 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 26 November 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*Yeah. I did look into adding the ability for multiple characters, but two solutions I saw were using a second template which people repeat for each character a la the "Luck row" template, or using an <nowiki>{{#if:}}</nowiki> function, which for the life of me I couldn't get to work because it requires the same \| symbols that tables do >.< - If I could work out how to avoid that conflict, it'd be a breeze to implement. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 15:28, 25 November 2006 (PST)		*Yeah. I did look into adding the ability for multiple characters, but two solutions I saw were using a second template which people repeat for each character a la the "Luck row" template, or using an <nowiki>{{#if:}}</nowiki> function, which for the life of me I couldn't get to work because it requires the same \| symbols that tables do >.< - If I could work out how to avoid that conflict, it'd be a breeze to implement. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 15:28, 25 November 2006 (PST)
		+	:Yeah. Trying to work this one out, I've made a complete embarrasment of myself as seen in "Recent Changes". If you use {{}} to group the "then" argument necessary, the {{ and }} appear on the table and look stupid. But if you don't use them, the table pretty much breaks.
		+	:If it becomes necessary >.< then I would go with an additional template. That said, I believe the table's formatting for expert types will be a far more important within a week. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 16:26, 25 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 25 November 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*: N.B.:		*: N.B.:
	{{Character Profile\|name= Ethan \|race= Minority \|gender= Futa \|level= OVER 9000! \|type= Annoying \|hunter= For girls only \|ranger= Sniped Pim Fortuyn \|force= With him}}		{{Character Profile\|name= Ethan \|race= Minority \|gender= Futa \|level= OVER 9000! \|type= Annoying \|hunter= For girls only \|ranger= Sniped Pim Fortuyn \|force= With him}}
		+
		+	*Yeah. I did look into adding the ability for multiple characters, but two solutions I saw were using a second template which people repeat for each character a la the "Luck row" template, or using an <nowiki>{{#if:}}</nowiki> function, which for the life of me I couldn't get to work because it requires the same \| symbols that tables do >.< - If I could work out how to avoid that conflict, it'd be a breeze to implement. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 15:28, 25 November 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 25 November 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*Actually this is only a suggestion for the time being. PSUPedia is a wiki about the game, not it's players. Thus making a template for something like this isn't necessarily "on topic" as far as the wiki goes.		*Actually this is only a suggestion for the time being. PSUPedia is a wiki about the game, not it's players. Thus making a template for something like this isn't necessarily "on topic" as far as the wiki goes.
	:That said, I have noticed a few people who had cloned the profile in my User page, something which if becomes semi-common practise, would benefit from standardisation such as this. Basically looking for input on whether this is a good idea or not. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 10:54, 25 November 2006 (PST)		:That said, I have noticed a few people who had cloned the profile in my User page, something which if becomes semi-common practise, would benefit from standardisation such as this. Basically looking for input on whether this is a good idea or not. - [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 10:54, 25 November 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	* As long as people think it's convenient, it's great, I guess. As long as we're not going to tell people "NO STOP YOU SHOULD USE THE TEMPLATE" or something there shouldn't really be any problems about this. On a sidenote, there isn't really an easy way to use this template for multiple characters without getting the bold description row multiple times as well. One possible way to get around this would be to use parser functions to allow the first line to be turned on/off using parameters or something. I've also considered using different templates for the two lines, but that'd probably be more of a pain. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 13:37, 25 November 2006 (PST)
		+	*: N.B.:
		+	{{Character Profile\|name= Ethan \|race= Minority \|gender= Futa \|level= OVER 9000! \|type= Annoying \|hunter= For girls only \|ranger= Sniped Pim Fortuyn \|force= With him}}