Talk:Weapon grinding - Revision history

A Man in Flames at 17:04, 9 March 2012

2012-03-09T17:04:12Z

ChaseNetwork: /* Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6 */

2011-11-24T07:43:26Z

‎Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6

EspioKaos: /* Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6 */

2011-11-23T01:09:49Z

‎Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6

ChaseNetwork: /* Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6 */ new section

2011-11-22T20:16:36Z

‎Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6: new section

Mewn: /* correction */

2008-10-03T11:09:55Z

‎correction

Synner: /* correction */

2008-10-03T10:55:46Z

‎correction

Synner: correction

2008-10-03T10:51:56Z

correction

EspioKaos: /* Source for success rate shorthand cutoffs? */

2008-04-01T17:33:55Z

‎Source for success rate shorthand cutoffs?

Essen: /* Source for success rate shorthand cutoffs? */

2008-04-01T17:32:13Z

‎Source for success rate shorthand cutoffs?

Miraglyth: Curiousity.

2008-04-01T17:10:23Z

Curiousity.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 9 March 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:
	* You guys have a grind boost of +15% going on right now, so all of the in-game rates will be higher than these charts. They'll go back to normal after maintenance ends on December 2, though. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 20:09, 22 November 2011 (EST)		* You guys have a grind boost of +15% going on right now, so all of the in-game rates will be higher than these charts. They'll go back to normal after maintenance ends on December 2, though. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 20:09, 22 November 2011 (EST)
	** Oh, that sucks then. I keep breaking on my C+10s. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 02:43, 24 November 2011 (EST)		** Oh, that sucks then. I keep breaking on my C+10s. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 02:43, 24 November 2011 (EST)
		+
		+	== Ending the myth behind 'Guaranteed' and 'No chance' ==
		+
		+	Due to the constant debates I have seen on the official forums, I decided I would edit the overview of the odds for success chart to reflect that when the message 'There is no chance of failure' appears, it does in fact mean 100% success. I have grinded weapons with success rates of 95-98% (and even broke a weapon with a 98% chance too!) and the in game message never read as no chance of failure, but in fact 'The probability of success seems very high.". I have also edited the 'No chance of success' cell as well, as I have verfied on theoretical 3-5% chance grinds that the message would read Very low and not 'No chance'. Hope this clears up informational debates in the future!
		+
		+	[[User:A Man in Flames\|A Man in Flames]] 12:04, 9 March 2012 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 24 November 2011
Line 30:		Line 30:
	When grinding my Python, I got it to 5/10. I decided to use a Grinder A+3 next, and she said Fifty-Fifty. It indicates Low here on the tables. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 15:16, 22 November 2011 (EST)		When grinding my Python, I got it to 5/10. I decided to use a Grinder A+3 next, and she said Fifty-Fifty. It indicates Low here on the tables. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 15:16, 22 November 2011 (EST)
	* You guys have a grind boost of +15% going on right now, so all of the in-game rates will be higher than these charts. They'll go back to normal after maintenance ends on December 2, though. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 20:09, 22 November 2011 (EST)		* You guys have a grind boost of +15% going on right now, so all of the in-game rates will be higher than these charts. They'll go back to normal after maintenance ends on December 2, though. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 20:09, 22 November 2011 (EST)
		+	** Oh, that sucks then. I keep breaking on my C+10s. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 02:43, 24 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 23 November 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:

	When grinding my Python, I got it to 5/10. I decided to use a Grinder A+3 next, and she said Fifty-Fifty. It indicates Low here on the tables. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 15:16, 22 November 2011 (EST)		When grinding my Python, I got it to 5/10. I decided to use a Grinder A+3 next, and she said Fifty-Fifty. It indicates Low here on the tables. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 15:16, 22 November 2011 (EST)
		+	* You guys have a grind boost of +15% going on right now, so all of the in-game rates will be higher than these charts. They'll go back to normal after maintenance ends on December 2, though. - [[User:EspioKaos\|EspioKaos]] 20:09, 22 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 22 November 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:

	* The info on the article is for the base success rates. There's currently a grind boost going on, so it goes without saying that the current info is 'wrong,' but it should be correct again when the bonus runs out. I'll stick a note on the article itself though just to make this clear. In the meantime this should be accurate: [http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/6677/4sma1dur9.png] (thanks to green_man for pointing this out to me). Oh, and as a small note, it helps if you sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> so we can see who you are and when you made the comment. - [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 06:09, 3 October 2008 (CDT)		* The info on the article is for the base success rates. There's currently a grind boost going on, so it goes without saying that the current info is 'wrong,' but it should be correct again when the bonus runs out. I'll stick a note on the article itself though just to make this clear. In the meantime this should be accurate: [http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/6677/4sma1dur9.png] (thanks to green_man for pointing this out to me). Oh, and as a small note, it helps if you sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> so we can see who you are and when you made the comment. - [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 06:09, 3 October 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	== Megaholy Fortune. A-Rank 5 -> 6 ==
		+
		+	When grinding my Python, I got it to 5/10. I decided to use a Grinder A+3 next, and she said Fifty-Fifty. It indicates Low here on the tables. [[User:ChaseNetwork\|ChaseNetwork]] 15:16, 22 November 2011 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 3 October 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:

	oh btw the weapons i was grinding were fuka-misaki(10) and yamata-misaki(11) and both had the same results		oh btw the weapons i was grinding were fuka-misaki(10) and yamata-misaki(11) and both had the same results
		+
		+	* The info on the article is for the base success rates. There's currently a grind boost going on, so it goes without saying that the current info is 'wrong,' but it should be correct again when the bonus runs out. I'll stick a note on the article itself though just to make this clear. In the meantime this should be accurate: [http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/6677/4sma1dur9.png] (thanks to green_man for pointing this out to me). Oh, and as a small note, it helps if you sign your comments using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> so we can see who you are and when you made the comment. - [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 06:09, 3 October 2008 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:55, 3 October 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I didn't bother to read this whole page to see if my info has already been posted but when grinding S rank weapons i used a S+8 for 0-1 and it was no chance for failure instead of very high like this pages says, also the same thing when i used a S+9 for 1-2; no chance for failure. but at S+10 2-3 was correct saying very high		I didn't bother to read this whole page to see if my info has already been posted but when grinding S rank weapons i used a S+8 for 0-1 and it was no chance for failure instead of very high like this pages says, also the same thing when i used a S+9 for 1-2; no chance for failure. but at S+10 2-3 was correct saying very high
		+
		+	oh btw the weapons i was grinding were fuka-misaki(10) and yamata-misaki(11) and both had the same results

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 3 October 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*** The [http://psupedia.info/Weapon_Grinding#Stat_Increments Stat Increments] section should probably be moved to an entirely new page to optimise the loading times. This is probably more convenient for people who have to quickly find out something rather than trawl through mountains of stuff or wait a while and althought this is off-topic, there are alot of other pages that could do with the same thing heres a [http://psupedia.info/Special:Longpages list] of them for any who care. I also think that Battoh's idea of using a format similar to that of the JP wiki is good because right now it looks abit confusing. [[User:D-Scythe\|D-Scythe]]		*** The [http://psupedia.info/Weapon_Grinding#Stat_Increments Stat Increments] section should probably be moved to an entirely new page to optimise the loading times. This is probably more convenient for people who have to quickly find out something rather than trawl through mountains of stuff or wait a while and althought this is off-topic, there are alot of other pages that could do with the same thing heres a [http://psupedia.info/Special:Longpages list] of them for any who care. I also think that Battoh's idea of using a format similar to that of the JP wiki is good because right now it looks abit confusing. [[User:D-Scythe\|D-Scythe]]
	**** Just moved the stats section to a new page ([[Weapon grinding (Stat Increases)]]) and took it off this main page. I also created a Weapons Grinding category for if more grinding related pages are made. I hope it looks okay. --[[User:Kietrinia\|Kit]] 11:01, 22 December 2007 (CST)		**** Just moved the stats section to a new page ([[Weapon grinding (Stat Increases)]]) and took it off this main page. I also created a Weapons Grinding category for if more grinding related pages are made. I hope it looks okay. --[[User:Kietrinia\|Kit]] 11:01, 22 December 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	== correction ==
		+
		+	I didn't bother to read this whole page to see if my info has already been posted but when grinding S rank weapons i used a S+8 for 0-1 and it was no chance for failure instead of very high like this pages says, also the same thing when i used a S+9 for 1-2; no chance for failure. but at S+10 2-3 was correct saying very high

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 * Just to satisfy my curiosity: What's the source on the ranges each NPC-given success possibility cover (e.g. "No failure" = 95.0%-100.0%)? Tych added them June last year so I believe them, but I'm still interested in knowing where they came from. The original bible? [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 12:10, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
 ** Dunno about these, but the current correct ones are [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu6092.png C], [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu6091.png B], [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu6090.png A] and [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu11460.txt S] (the second chart). [[User:Essen|Essen]] 12:32, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
 == Old Conversations ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 1 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Just to satisfy my curiosity: What's the source on the ranges each NPC-given success possibility cover (e.g. "No failure" = 95.0%-100.0%)? Tych added them June last year so I believe them, but I'm still interested in knowing where they came from. The original bible? [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 12:10, 1 April 2008 (CDT)		* Just to satisfy my curiosity: What's the source on the ranges each NPC-given success possibility cover (e.g. "No failure" = 95.0%-100.0%)? Tych added them June last year so I believe them, but I'm still interested in knowing where they came from. The original bible? [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 12:10, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
		+	** Dunno about these, but the current correct ones are [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu6092.png C], [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu6091.png B], [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu6090.png A] and [http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu11460.txt S] (the second chart). [[User:Essen\|Essen]] 12:32, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

	== Old Conversations ==		== Old Conversations ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 1 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Source for success rate shorthand cutoffs? ==
		+
		+	* Just to satisfy my curiosity: What's the source on the ranges each NPC-given success possibility cover (e.g. "No failure" = 95.0%-100.0%)? Tych added them June last year so I believe them, but I'm still interested in knowing where they came from. The original bible? [[User:Miraglyth\|Miraglyth]] 12:10, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
		+
		+	== Old Conversations ==
		+
	* So, I started on stat increments. I realize that Att./Tech. fields are still missing, and that the colspan interface just really fails >_<;, but bear with the latter for a bit please. I believe it may at least be useful while trying to complete the figures. I hope this is going to work out. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 17:24, 17 November 2006 (PST)		* So, I started on stat increments. I realize that Att./Tech. fields are still missing, and that the colspan interface just really fails >_<;, but bear with the latter for a bit please. I believe it may at least be useful while trying to complete the figures. I hope this is going to work out. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 17:24, 17 November 2006 (PST)