Talk:Nanoblasts - Revision history

Daecon: Vande Val

2009-04-09T08:38:51Z

Vande Val

Starrz at 20:31, 2 May 2007

2007-05-02T20:31:37Z

PaleFire at 05:19, 26 April 2007

2007-04-26T05:19:22Z

Tycho at 17:15, 8 December 2006

2006-12-08T17:15:03Z

Mmy: Signature is needed

2006-12-08T16:29:29Z

Signature is needed

Mmy at 16:25, 8 December 2006

2006-12-08T16:25:38Z

Tycho at 07:04, 8 October 2006

2006-10-08T07:04:28Z

New page

* [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/uneffective uneffective] isn't even a word, while [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ineffective ineffective] is. I'm changing it back. >_>;

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:38, 9 April 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I guess I can upload some pictures of the different blast badge designs. Just let me know where I can put them. (Under the descriptions maybe?) [[User:Starrz\|Starrz]] 21:31, 2 May 2007 (BST)		I guess I can upload some pictures of the different blast badge designs. Just let me know where I can put them. (Under the descriptions maybe?) [[User:Starrz\|Starrz]] 21:31, 2 May 2007 (BST)
		+
		+	== Vande Val ==
		+
		+	How, exactly does it "take a large toll physically"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 2 May 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Should we get some screencaps of the different blast badge tattoos, or would it be too much of a hassle to upload? [[User:PaleFire\|Palefire]] 11:17 25 April 2007 (PST)		Should we get some screencaps of the different blast badge tattoos, or would it be too much of a hassle to upload? [[User:PaleFire\|Palefire]] 11:17 25 April 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	I guess I can upload some pictures of the different blast badge designs. Just let me know where I can put them. (Under the descriptions maybe?) [[User:Starrz\|Starrz]] 21:31, 2 May 2007 (BST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 26 April 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy\|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST)		Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy\|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST)
	* I remember they were just put in because they were in the official descriptions. No clue about the English ones, but I don't really care either way. Yes, a lot of repetitive descriptions ''are'' annoying. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 09:15, 8 December 2006 (PST)		* I remember they were just put in because they were in the official descriptions. No clue about the English ones, but I don't really care either way. Yes, a lot of repetitive descriptions ''are'' annoying. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 09:15, 8 December 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	Should we get some screencaps of the different blast badge tattoos, or would it be too much of a hassle to upload? [[User:PaleFire\|Palefire]] 11:17 25 April 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 8 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy\|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST)		Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy\|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST)
		+	* I remember they were just put in because they were in the official descriptions. No clue about the English ones, but I don't really care either way. Yes, a lot of repetitive descriptions ''are'' annoying. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 09:15, 8 December 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 8 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/uneffective uneffective] isn't even a word, while [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ineffective ineffective] is. I'm changing it back. >_>;		* [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/uneffective uneffective] isn't even a word, while [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ineffective ineffective] is. I'm changing it back. >_>;

−	Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions?	+	Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy\|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 8 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/uneffective uneffective] isn't even a word, while [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ineffective ineffective] is. I'm changing it back. >_>;		* [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/uneffective uneffective] isn't even a word, while [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ineffective ineffective] is. I'm changing it back. >_>;
		+
		+	Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions?