Talk:Elements - Revision history

Tycho at 13:09, 13 December 2006

2006-12-13T13:09:34Z

Tycho at 22:09, 1 September 2006

2006-09-01T22:09:31Z

Mewn at 21:23, 1 September 2006

2006-09-01T21:23:06Z

Tycho at 19:37, 1 September 2006

2006-09-01T19:37:19Z

New page

* Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 13 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT)		* It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
	* The way I see it green is just the 'default' colour. Also, rather than regarding those Photon's as "elementless"'s ones, I'd just say they're "the other ones". Either interpretation would make sense (even if 'elementless' doesn't share many properties with the 'real' elements), but in the current interpretation, I think that at least the name 'None' should be changed to 'n/a' as well.		* The way I see it green is just the 'default' colour. Also, rather than regarding those Photon's as "elementless"'s ones, I'd just say they're "the other ones". Either interpretation would make sense (even if 'elementless' doesn't share many properties with the 'real' elements), but in the current interpretation, I think that at least the name 'None' should be changed to 'n/a' as well.
		+
		+	== Lightning, not Thunder ==
		+	* I told you~. :p > Mewn - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 05:09, 13 December 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 1 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT)		* Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
	* It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT)		* It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
		+	* The way I see it green is just the 'default' colour. Also, rather than regarding those Photon's as "elementless"'s ones, I'd just say they're "the other ones". Either interpretation would make sense (even if 'elementless' doesn't share many properties with the 'real' elements), but in the current interpretation, I think that at least the name 'None' should be changed to 'n/a' as well.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 1 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT)		* Should 'None' really be included as a table column? In my opinion, this barely makes sense, since elementless stuff does not really share the same properties as their equivalents that do have an elemental affiliation. On top of that, I think it makes more sense to think that certain Melee Weapons do not have any elements associated with them, then to say they're affiliated with a special element called 'None'. D: - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]] 12:37, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
		+	* It's there for completeness, but since 'non-elemental' has its own unique photon color and photons I think it should stay [[User:Mewn\|Mewn]] 14:23, 1 September 2006 (PDT)